P For Psyop: The Movie "Citizen Vigilante" Is Neither

USA is nearly dead and just in time for its 250th anniversary. The Jews are pushing so hard… integrating the Pentagon into Mossad, mandatory Federal-AI surveillance, obliterating the very concept of citizenship, continued financial rapine of the economy, continued mass migration at all costs, criminalizing disapproval of das Juden for any reason… that I’ve begun hearing patriotism from even the welfare queens of California! It was predictable that a pressure-release valve of some kind would be needed at this juncture, and guess what? A movie of a white American veteran going full murder hobo on tribes of dusky Muslims infesting Germany just got released to great manufactured fanfare! “Germany tried to ban this movie but the Technocrats distributed it free to the white world out of the goodness of their hearts!” It’s such a fake and gay psyop that only Uwe Boll was willing to put his name on it, and that should disgust you more than the coitus interruptus by fungus scene!

“Citizen Vigilante”

https://www.unz.com/article/citizen-vigilante

By Mark Gullick, 1 July 2026

For those of us on the political Right, going to the cinema has been an increasingly unrewarding experience. Endless comic-book franchises, the absurd over-representation of ethnic minorities in Hollywood movies, the influence of “woke” and its resultant cinematic sermonizing; these are hardly the 1970s, perhaps the greatest decade in the history of cinema. Audiences get smaller as White moviegoers decide they are tired of paying a good deal of money to be scolded by a Hollywood screenwriting team.

So when a movie made by ((them)) came along suddenly confirming your long-held beliefs instead of theirs, you suspected an ulterior motive, yes?

Bueller?

Hollywood used to hold the reins of cinematic power, and we know how Tinseltown is run and by whom it is run. This is no longer the case, which makes it far more difficult to ban movies.

Citizen Vigilante was directed by Uwe Boll…

“No longer the case”, eh?

…and stars Armie Hammer as the vigilante of the title. Both men are Hollywood outcasts, for differing reasons. Boll has little to his credit, and Hammer is really making a comeback move after years in the wilderness.

The (very Jewish) Hammer family excites the Kremlinologist in me! Patriarch Armand Hammer’s wikipedia page is chock-full of International Communist insider activity! Head of USA’s Occidental Petroleum, with heavy ties to Libya until Gaddafi nationalized the company… Nixon crony… Cayman Islands… oh, where to start!

Armie was raised at a private Christian school in Los Angeles, offering a potential early link to the Mears Cabal. His first leading role was playing Mears puppet Billy Graham in a biographical movie, no less! He was Canceled in 2021 by rape allegations that LA City & County declined to prosecute by 2025, citing insufficient evidence.

Armie is the second time a previously secret insider of the world government, brought his bloodline to my attention by way of a starring role in media. The previous was Nicholas Galtizine, lead actor in the last month-released remake Masters Of the Universe. The previous live-action movie was in 1987 starring Dolph Lundgren; you may remember him as Ivan Drago in Rocky IV. The latter (below left) was a solid choice for a real-life Prince Adam; the former (below right), not so much. One wonders if the modern movie industry has consciously forsaken the concepts of profit and storytelling in order to serve as a fashion show for insiders.

Photo credit h ttps://people.com/see-original-masters-of-the-universe-cast-with-new-stars-11890534

Nick’s father, Geoffrey Leo Alexander Galitzine, is a never-previously-publicly-named financier of City of London who went into philanthropy by purchasing a small glass-recycling company. That’s surely not the extent of his career, but it’s all that anybody will admit, and the first time I got so much as the name of a London insider. Geoffrey married into Greek nobility. There are some curiously connected Greeks; I first noticed when a couple turned up in California’s senior government over the years, meaning the California Air Resources Board more than the dog & pony show legislature; but I haven’t yet had anything specific to highlight.

Hammer plays Michael Sanders, an American who has served in the military and is now in the property business by virtue of his father’s death. He is in some eastern European country, possibly Croatia, and he is not strictly there on legitimate business. He has another agenda. Sanders just sort of arrives, like Arnold in The Terminator, and starts wiping people out, enraged by the release of a gang of rapists by a liberal judge.

I haven’t seen the film and don’t intend to, not even when Elon Musk offered it for free, because Uwe Boll was sufficient warning, so I must take these scenes as presented. Already, that doesn’t sound like a revenge flick. If Sanders was wronged then revenge would have been personal, but if some third party was wronged and Sanders acted “on their behalf” then revenge would have been… POLITICAL. That’s not vigilantism, that’s Marxist terrorism.

And so it begins.

He kills petty criminals, the police, judges, the family of a Muslim rape gang, purely because he sees the state as dysfunctional and in need of a corrective. This is the last message the Western gauleiters want to hear—or want their citizens to hear.

Maybe revolution, maybe terrorism, either way not vigilantism! And to the contrary of the author: the Jews who are formalizing their conquest of the United States specifically and Europe generally, would like nothing better than for the Christians to begin slaughtering Muslims because of our maltreatment by Jews. Like women, they’re well-known for “let’s you and him fight” tendencies.

This is a deeply flawed film in cinematic terms, but so are many important movies.

No. Real, legitimate success requires both important themes and at least decent production values. My blog covers critically important spiritual & current-event issues, but my presentation often lacks enough to interfere with what I have to say. I can see it when I go back and read my old work. Objectively, therefore, I don’t merit being a big-and-famous blogger.

The communication event is NOT merely the content!

Despite the German government effectively banning the film by refusing to grant an it age certificate (the British are still making up their minds), the film can be found online. Elon Musk ran it on X for 48 hours and, at the time of writing, it can be found on Internet Archive and YouTube.

How charitable of Elon Musk. If he was any more charitable, he’d quit trying to replace humanity with Skynet-linked robots.

Another new movie, Supergirl, typifies the new “go woke, go broke” model Hollywood has chosen, and on its opening weekend took just $36 million. It stands to lose $100 million, while Boll’s move is reputed to have made the same amount. But by banning Citizen Vigilante, the German government, and those following suit, have triggered the infamous “Streisand effect”, due to which the attempt to keep something out of the news does the exact opposite.

It’s not Streisand effect when a top-level Technocrat pushes it worldwide for free. “The government wants to stop us but there’s nothing they can do!” is Red Flag #1 for controlled opposition.

The movie opens in a grocery store, where a mother and her young son are shopping. Once they leave the store, a non-White man passes them in the street, pausing only to plunge a kitchen-knife into the woman’s neck, and she explosively bleeds out in front of her child. We get it, it’s going to be a revenge movie, an eastern European Death Wish.

Death Wish began with the protagonist’s own family attacked. This movie begins with third-party victims? That cannot lead to revenge! At least, not any European-Christian concept of revenge.

But who is the avenger? He is, we are informed by a newsreader, the “citizen vigilante”. A vox pop of non-vigilante citizens provides the government’s worst fear. “This guy’s a real hero”, says one woman. “We need more like him”. “This guy is taking out the trash”. “I want to marry him”, says another woman. That ought to be qualified. It is well known that women are always trying to marry serial killers who are in jail.

Marriage is dead because women have the welfare state guaranteeing financial support. It’s basic Red Pill knowledge that women will happily get her financial & sexual needs met from different sources, in the event she fails to win the marital lottery. Ergo, women skank with inmates purely for the guaranteed drama.

What is rattling the cage of the establishment is that there is so much rhetoric in the vigilante’s broadcasts about the system failing. “What if everything they told you is nonsense?”, says Sanders in an unexplained TV broadcast.

This is anathema to technocrats because the system is all there is for them…

Elon Musk, dude.

Sanders is clearly something of a psychological enigma. He sleeps with a prostitute but stops the intimate act abruptly when he spots a patch of black mold on the wall. What now concerns him is the effect on his respiratory system. He is clearly disconnected from other people in the same way that Travis Bickle is in Taxi Driver, although a good deal more intelligent.

I am glad I didn’t watch this movie, and wonder about the disgust reflex of everybody involved in its making.

So then, this movie’s morality can’t possibly appeal to an honest Christian. Or should I say, an informed Christian who knows that scene exists! That sounds funny coming from a blogger who refused to watch the movie in the first place, but even I make an effort to inform myself of what I talk about.

The pundits who only saw the title “Citizen Vigilante” and proceeded to chat about vigilantism against Islam, not so much. This isn’t the first time they’ve beaten “Christians versus Muslims” war drums, either. Inciting that specific conflict has been a Zionist priority ever since a few red heifers got cloned, and more than a few purportedly Christian dissidents have happily played along.

Talking his office manager through various property concerns, Sanders is balanced, terse, and precise. But he is also clearly psychopathic to an advanced degree. Having drugged a judge, he drives him out into the countryside in order to execute him. On the journey, he makes a small speech about the breakdown of a system which was supposed to protect people, and also points out the stupidity and sheep-like quality of those people. As an example, Sanders swerves the car into the other lane and straight at a car coming in the other direction. The other car swerves off the road, crashes, and explodes. Sanders calmly explains to the comatose judge that if the driver had broken the law, just for a moment, he could have taken the other lane and lived. But he didn’t. He couldn’t break the law and now he’s dead.

That’s not a revenge fantasy, either. That’s capital murder of innocents. That’s James Bond proving he’s a tough guy by wasting the parking valet.

The judge is not long in following, having acquitted both drug dealers and a gang of rapists. Having shot him full of heroin, Sanders slits the judge’s wrists and leaves him to bleed out.

That was bad scriptwriting. Show the audience, don’t tell! You never see Edmond Dantès of Count of Monte Cristo explaining to his targets why they must suffer, because the audience already knows and (being white) doesn’t enjoy the cheap thrill of making another man suffer needlessly. It’s the turnabout that is the point of a revenge fantasy. The justice by unlawful methods, not political ascendance by unlawful methods.

No reviews that I read mention scenes of justice. Only tit-for-tat butchery.

Again, the semiotics here are going to cause grave concern in some quarters… What makes the ban politicized here is that the violence in the movie is of no concern to the censor; it’s the language. Sanders is unequivocal about who is the cause of the breakdown of the system. It is “an unfriendly takeover by Islamist extremists and the blind-sided woke Left”.

Sanders didn’t mention the Kalergi plan? The secret societies and intelligence communities? Did he give ANY context for how so many parallel unfriendly takeovers came to happen at the same time? While I’m as angry about the rape gangs as any righteous man, I won’t be distracted by the tool from the hand that wields it.

We must first get rid of the traitors, THEN get rid of the foreigners!

Now, across Europe and certainly in the UK, Islamist extremists and the woke Left are very powerful. Both lobbies increasingly police language and set the limits of what is acceptable. A viral movie singling them out is putting a target on itself. And then there is the Muslim angle.

In one of the final scenes, Sanders has taken a Muslim family hostage in their apartment. The boy had been involved in the gang-rape, and Sanders has visited the victim in hospital. She has been terribly beaten and, when Sanders asks if she wants justice, she replies through her tears that she does.

That’s Marxism. “I am a representative of the proletariat and reluctantly seize political power for myself only because they wish me to. Workers of the world, empower me to kill in your name!”

Tracking down the family, and prior to executing them along with the other gang members, Sanders has a brief conversation with the father in which he questions the man’s values. “They are Koranic values”, the man replies. Sanders calls those values archaic before shooting the entire family.

Archaic, not evil? That’s Marxism again. Progress is inevitable! The future is certain, the past is unknown! No objective morality exists!

This is a low-budget movie, but it is still riddled with avoidable faults. The plot is full of holes, and the shift in timeline is fairly pointless. Hammer’s central performance is strong, but the camerawork is unfocussed and sloppy. That said, this is not a film many will be viewing cinematically, but rather politically.

Yes, exactly. POLITICALLY. This movie is not about any kind of justice, forget mercy. It’s about Nietzschean will-to-power, as if evil exists in this world only because you personally are not seated upon its throne.

Elon Musk could hardly avoid getting involved. As the world’s first trillionaire…

“Look how smart he is! A thirteen-digit IQ!”

…he can also afford to be the world’s biggest troll, and it is becoming easy to predict what will attract his attention. He ran the movie on X for 48 hours, and there is already talk of a sequel set in America. With Musk’s endorsement, there won’t be much the US deep state can do about it, although they will try.

HE IS THE U.S. DEEP STATE! This level of stupid HURTS! Did this author not notice Israel weaponizing Earthlink against Gaza & Iran?

Musk contacted Boll’s podcast personally — Boll’s people thought at first it was a parody account — and although the posting of the movie on X hurts potential revenue, it was a calculated risk which is paying off. Variety have just reported that the movie has secured worldwide distribution, although the magazine called Citizen Vigilante “a violent, incoherent, morally bankrupt slice of exploitation”. Boll is unfazed, saying that he likes exploitation movies, and doesn’t “try to be Tarkovsky”. The director also claims that a lot of the criticism of the film is politically motivated, while some in Hollywood defend him and his film, including Roger Avary, who wrote the screenplay to Pulp Fiction and won an Oscar for it.

Uwe Boll may not be a talented director, but he has a pulpit now and he is certainly using it.

He was tapped to provide a relief valve. Nothing more.

One of Sanders’ themes in his V for Vendetta-style broadcasts is not just the failure and collapse of a system which was supposed to guarantee law, order, and justice. “The system was never meant to give you justice”, he says.

More like P for Psyop. “Your governments were never legitimate! It’s time for a New World Order! Now that you’ve been properly demoralized, commence Yuri Bezmenov’s Phase Two!”

This is a key revelation, and I have written before about public reluctance to accept that their governments are not incompetent but malevolent. The flooding of Europe with migrants was never due to incompetence, but has been the long-term plan for decades.

What ((foreign influence)) twisted our governments to betray every trust they were ever given? It didn’t just happen, as if Keir Starmer was an ordinary guy until he was bit by a werewolf and began living a two-tiered life.

It seems a long time since the 1970s, and the summer movie being Grease or Star Wars. Boll asks a similar question of contemporary Hollywood; where are the good movies?

Still not in Uwe Boll’s filmography! “Citizen Vigilante” is neither of those concepts! You want a Uwe Boll revenge fantasy worth watching, here you go:

Segue

h ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uwe_Boll

Boll made headlines by challenging his critics to “put up or shut up”. In June 2006, his production company issued a press release stating that Boll would challenge his five harshest critics each to a 10-round boxing match. Invitations were also open to film directors Quentin Tarantino and Roger Avary. To qualify, critics had to have written two extremely negative reviews of Boll, in print or on the Web. In 2005, footage from the fights were to be included on the DVD of his upcoming film Postal… GoldenPalace.com decided to sponsor this event, dubbing it “Raging Boll” (a play on the 1980 Martin Scorsese film Raging Bull)… Boll fought and won against all five participants. The first match took place on 5 September 2006 in Estepona, Spain, against Carlos Palencia. The others battled on 23 September 2006, at the Plaza of Nations in Vancouver, Canada.

End segue

Where is this generation’s The Deer Hunter, Raging Bull, Apocalypse Now!, or The Godfather?

Asked & answered!

Those movies had tough moral boundaries and they asked questions. Movies today are not designed to ask questions of the viewer, they are crafted to give that viewer answers to questions the producers think they ought to be asking.

Which gives those movies something in common with our governments. You don’t suppose the same people could be responsible for the same corruption? Honestly, at this point if you aren’t Naming the Jew, both the Globalist and Zionist factions, then you’re just another talking head.

Fortunately, the comments section wasn’t buying Citizen Vigilante either, and I don’t mean its free distribution.

“So, a movie about an American Jew moving to Europe to become a serial killer.”

“Very cheesy movie. Uwe Boll remains Uwe Boll.”

“Does the vigilante track down the Jews who used NGOs to facilitate the immigrant invasion? Will the American version have the vigilante hunting the Jews in AIPAC who’ve seized control of our country? Will he track down and execute the vile Christian Zionists, too? Might be worth watching then.”

“The movie is disgusting–open sex contrary to Christian morals. The unbelievable take that the main character dresses up in all tactical gear to shoot three men in a darkened hallway–when you have the drop on them–you don’t need tactical gear; this movie was super silly. And then when secrecy is needed, he opens the door to the outside and walks outside in public view in full tactical gear. Pretty Silly!”

We live in disheartening times. Allowing the devil to manipulate us into choosing evil “that good may result” is not the solution! This is one victory that each of us can achieve, that we do not join this fallen world in its faction-driven political mudslinging. Refusal will require active effort.

Another achievable victory is remembering that Boll “may not be a talented director” instead of watching & being sorry, again.