Why Chicago? A Dangerous Phone Call From 1968 to 2025

The Sixties never ended for some people… specifically, America’s ruling class. This post won’t have a tidy conclusion because it deals with future events, but it does cover the American past leading up to it.

I’ve previously traced how the Freemasonic Mears family of Chicago fell from bankster grace, moved to Minnesota to breed & engineer Henrietta as a false prophetess with which to infiltrate the Evangelical Church… very successfully… then jumped from Minneapolis to Los Angeles, to founding or converging the Protestant seminaries, to its current apogee as the goyim half of the Greater Israel Zionist movement.

The face of that Zionist movement, the once-and-future President Donald Trump, has declared his intent to deploy the U.S. military domestically against “illegal immigrants”. His first designated target is…

…Chicago?!

Of all the locations he could have picked to be first in his literally militarized anti-illegal-immigration campaign, he picked the birthplace of the current Zionist movement that he heads.

Ain’t that somethin’.

Chicago to be ground zero for mass deportations, Trump border czar tells Illinois Republicans

h ttps://www.wbez.org/immigration/2024/12/10/border-czar-tom-homan-donald-trump-chicago-pritzker-brandon-johnson-immigration

By Tina Sfondeles, 10 December 2024

President-elect Donald Trump’s border czar Tom Homan came to Chicago on Monday to implore Mayor Brandon Johnson and Gov. JB Pritzker to “come to the table” and negotiate with him over a mass deportation plan that he declared would start right here.

Homan, the former acting head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement during Trump’s first term, began a 20-minute address at a Northwest Side GOP holiday party with some light ribbing before detailing his plan, which includes verifying the status of asylum-seekers and arresting people who are found harboring criminals.

There will be war, right there, a war that still doesn’t even pretend to end the immivasion. Many businesses hire & protect illegals simply to survive, that’s how bad the situation is. Many small governments have been threatpointed in similar fashion. I won’t shed a tear for the major offenders, many of which are operated by Trump’s Jewish backers… two words: Postville, Iowa… but I share the concern of Trump’s enemies, that illegal immigration is only the sugary wrapper on his tyrannical agenda. Not to be confused with the tyrannical agenda of Trump’s enemies, of course. Speaking of Trump’s enemies,

“Chicago’s in trouble because your mayor sucks and your governor sucks,” Homan said to cheers. Later, he called both “terrible” while also telling them to “come to the table.”

That sounds a bit more personal than “we’re dismantling the migrant-industrial complex”.

To Johnson, who has said he would protect the city’s immigrants from federal agents, Homan said, “If he doesn’t want to help, get the hell out of the way.”

Homan threatened to arrest people who are found with the criminals he is targeting, regardless of whether he has cooperation from the city. He urged the mayor to meet with him, following the lead of New York City Mayor Eric Adams.

“When they go find that bad guy, and when they find him, he’s probably going to be with others. Others that are not a priority because they’re not a criminal. But guess what? They’re going to be arrested, too,” Homan said. “Because he forced me into that position. So he wants to play the game. I’ll play that game.”

As happy as I am to see a Benedict Arnold be threatened with arrest, it’s another Benedict Arnold doing the threatening. Trump previously tried to use the military to administer Covid vaccines, so I wonder 1. why Trump is so eager to deploy the military domestically, and 2. when, not if, those soldiers will turn on me. What I don’t wonder is 3. Trump’s reluctance to charge the sanctuary state traitors with, y’know, treason. That’s because it’s a (s)word that hits both sides of the Jewish Civil War.

Objectively, Chicago is a poor choice to start the migrant purge. It’s not a military city with plenty of staging area. The problem people there are longtime-citizen blacks, not migrants. It’s a transportation hub, yes, but so is Houston which is also positioned to build that overdue wall along the Southern border. There will be a wall, yes? Walls are great for preventing illegal immigrants from needing to be deported in the first place. Chicago isn’t even close to the Canadian border, and using the military to build a border wall is legally defensible.

Chicago is America’s #3 city in population after NYC and Los Angeles. Me doing an honest job, would start with a smaller city with friendlier locals in order to work out the inevitable bugs & kinks of this unprecedented mobilization & task. Maybe Austin. Not Chicago. If instead Trump wants to go after his rivals before they’re ready, then Sacramento would be smarter… Trump’s big rival is shaping up to be California.

Homan reiterated that there was no plan to separate families, but said “it may happen.”

Homan said the parents of Dreamers will have two options: “You can either take a child home with you, or they just stay here. But you don’t get a pass.”

That is cruel and consistent.

h ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Homan

By 2014 under the Obama administration, Homan had begun to argue that separating children from their caregivers would be an effective means of discouraging illegal border crossings. The journalist Caitlin Dickerson describes him as the "intellectual father" of the policy, which he outlined years before it was adopted by the Trump administration. “Most parents don’t want to be separated,” Homan told Dickerson. He argued that this fact made separation an effective tool for immigration enforcement: “I’d be lying to you if I didn’t think that would have an effect.”

The idea of forcing parents to choose whether to orphan their own children, is heartless and as indicative of a dysfunctional moral compass as Homan serving the Obama administration loyally before jumping ship to Project 2025. The children should go with their parents, having their parents’ citizenship, full stop. Does Trump want to create more orphans to disappear into his backers’ tunnels?

I hate my rotten, Enlightened government. None of these factions are good guys. Not a single one since Charles Lindbergh.

How did the Freemasons lose control of Chicago in the first place? They clearly have… they used to own that place… many of their most wicked & successful plans came from Chicago, such as vaccinations… But today, it’s clearly not playing ball with Donald like Texas’ rulers.

Let’s look at Chicago with fresh eyes.

Why pick Chicago for the [2024] Democratic National Convention?

h ttps://www.aljazeera.com/news/longform/2024/8/15/what-does-chicago-represent-for-the-democratic-national-convention

On Monday, the Democratic National Convention is returning to a familiar location: Chicago, Illinois.

No other city in the United States has hosted as many presidential conventions. Chicago holds the record, having welcomed 26: Fourteen of the conventions were Republican, and the other 12 — including this year’s — have been Democratic.

But the city holds special significance for the Democrats, as a party stronghold for much of the last century.

Since 1931, only Democrats have presided as mayor there. And the city sits in the solidly blue Midwestern state of Illinois, which last voted for a Republican presidential candidate in 1988.

Still, experts and strategists say Chicago — the country’s third-largest city — is also symbolic of the hurdles the party faces, as it looks ahead to election day.

Chicago “is a real microcosm for the American experience”, said Meredith Shiner, a politics reporter and communications strategist based in the city.

“I think it also can symbolise some of the challenges that need to be conquered in order for the country to really realise its full potential.”

What you say…

The choice of location — announced more than a year in advance — is often seen as an extension of the party’s campaign strategy. In the case of Chicago, the Democratic National Committee unveiled its pick in April 2023, with a nod to the city’s critical position in the Midwest region.

“Illinois, along with Wisconsin, Michigan and Minnesota — part of the ‘blue wall’ — were crucial to the 2020 victory of President [Joe] Biden and Vice President Harris and to Democrats’ success in the 2022 midterm elections,” the committee said in a news release.

But that “blue wall” of support has been eroding. Midwestern states like Wisconsin and Michigan — both reliably Democratic in the 1990s and early 2000s — are now considered political battlegrounds.

Former Republican President Donald Trump won both states in 2016, putting an end to the Democrats’ streak in the region. Trump is running again this year against Harris.

Not a blue wall, then. Sure, Trump making Chicago “flip red” with a military invasion… unfortunate mental image… would make the entire region solidly Republican, but a military invasion of Sacramento would flip the entire State of California. Even the Democrats here no longer support Gov. Newsom. Cali has become a one-party state, the Willie Brown party.

Another one of those “built-in storylines” is the city’s intimate history with the labour movement.

Situated on the banks of Lake Michigan, not far from the Mississippi River, Chicago has long been a crossroads for American industry.

At the turn of the 20th century, with its railway yards, meat-packing businesses and manufacturing sector, Chicago gained a reputation for gritty, physical labour, earning it the nickname, “the City of Big Shoulders”.

Those labour conditions, in turn, sparked a backlash. A deadly protest in Chicago’s Haymarket Square in 1886 came to symbolise the fight for the eight-hour workday. Several years later, the city gave rise to the 1894 Pullman Strike, which ground the country’s rail traffic to a standstill.

Even after more than a century, Chicago continues to represent higher-than-average union activity.

Hmm. Freemasons and Communists both liked to use labor unions as front organizations.

But for all the ways Chicago represents Democratic ideals, critics say it has also exemplified the party’s failings and divisions.

Looming large over the upcoming Democratic National Convention is the spectre of an earlier convention in Chicago that ended in unrest and violence.

In 1968, the Democratic Party was facing questions about police violence, racial inequality and an unpopular overseas war, just as it is today. Then, as now, a turbulent election season was unfolding.

Still, the party assembled in Chicago for its 1968 Democratic National Convention.

But the Democrats were in turmoil. Less than three months prior, the assassination of Senator Robert F Kennedy, who was widely expected to be the Democratic nominee, left the party in disarray.

A late entry into the Democratic race — Hubert Humphrey — ultimately became the nominee. He did not win a single primary, a point of some contention.

Not a late entry, a selected entry.

The Vietnam conflict made no sense until I learned about the CIA’s drug trafficking efforts there. One easily imagines a schism forming between the inner circle drunk on greed and cruelty, making increasingly vile demands of its protective outer shell, not least of which was “your sons shall die for our profits”. Hence the remarkably violent anti-war protests “for peace”.

Which weren’t much different from today’s Jewish Civil War protests, not really. Evidence mounts for my theory on Babylonianism being an emergent religion.

FYI, during the Cold War years, the Freemasons loved to refer to themselves as “anticommunists”. It let them never say what they were FOR. It’s one of the telltales I look for in historical accounts.

At the time, political consultant Don Rose, 93, was the media spokesman for the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam (MOBE), which called for demonstrations against the war.

Also looming over the convention was the unpopular Vietnam War, which sowed deep divisions within the party. Chicago was a tinderbox. Protesters poured into the streets to vent their frustration. Chicago police were there waiting for them.

Don Rose was the press secretary for MLK Jr and card-carrying Trotskyite. Dick Daley spawned a political dynasty whose youngest son served Obama as chief of staff.

Daley was also personal friends of once-mayor Hubert Humphrey, and they were notorious for running political interference for each other. This may have been due to them being fellow Catholics in the final years when that was still a problem in American politics. It’s amazing how quickly America changed since… in… 1968.

From what I pieced together, there was a falling-out as of 1960 between the establishment’s Adlai Stevenson, then governor of Illinois, and the Kennedy clan. The patriarch Joe Kennedy went off-script against his CIA cronies. He used his media empire to boost his sons John and Bobby into national politics. He succeeded, but John being Catholic, the only way he could claim the “Solid South” was by accepting Lyndon Johnson whom he hated, for his VP.

Ah, balancing the ticket, what a stupid idea. Choose for your Vice President one of your rivals so that people will vote for you in hopes that you end up dead. Sometimes that even works, as JFK himself found out in 1968 after repeatedly derailing the Lyndon-faction’s agenda… Vietnam, Bay Of Pigs, Cuban Missile Crisis, killing Fidel Castro, other “anticommunist” stuff…

Which leads us to the 1968 Democrat National Convention in Chicago. There were four candidates for the Dem-Prez nominee:

• Incumbent Lyndon Johnson, but his mismanagement of JFK cost him so much support that he backed out.

• Hubert Humphrey, past mayor of Chicago and Minneapolis, ran on the Freemason-inspired Civil Rights agenda.

• Eugene McCarthy, Minnesota native and cosponsor of the 1965 Immigration Act, ran on the Freemason-inspired Civil Rights agenda. Gotta give the proles the illusion of choice, y’know.

• Robert Kennedy, a ((New Yorker)) who ran on the Freemason-inspired Civil Rights agenda. Thereby ACTUALLY giving the proles a choice! at least, a non-Masonic choice.

h ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_1968_presidential_campaign

On March 17, Kennedy made his first campaign appearances by marching in the St. Patrick's Day Parades in Boston and New York City. The following day, he delivered his first campaign speech at Kansas State University, where he had previously agreed to give a lecture honoring former Kansas governor and Republican Alfred Landon. At Kansas State, Kennedy drew a "record-setting crowd of 14,500 students" for his Landon Lecture. In his speech, Kennedy apologized for early mistakes and attacked President Johnson's Vietnam policy saying, "I was involved in many of the early decisions on Vietnam, decisions which helped set us on our present path." He further acknowledged that "past error is not excuse for its own perpetration." Later that day at the University of Kansas, Kennedy spoke to an audience of 19,000—one of the largest in the university's history.

Joe Kennedy was masterminding that media push. Those numbers were not natural.

During that speech he said, "I don't think that we have to shoot each other, to beat each other, to curse each other and criticize each other, I think that we can do better in this country. And that is why I run for President of the United States." From Kansas, Kennedy went on to campaign in the Democratic primaries in Indiana, Washington, D.C., Nebraska, Oregon, South Dakota, and California.

He won them except Oregon.

On June 4, Kennedy won the California primary with 46 percent of the vote to McCarthy's 42 percent. Author Joseph Palermo referred to the victory as Kennedy's "greatest." Kennedy also won the South Dakota primary, winning approximately 50 percent of the vote. He was now in second place with 393 total delegates, against Humphrey's 561 delegates.

Around midnight on June 5, Kennedy addressed supporters at the Ambassador Hotel in Los Angeles, confidently promising to heal the many divisions within the country.At approximately 12:10 a.m., concluding his victory speech, Kennedy said: "So my thanks to all of you and on to Chicago and let's win there."

Kennedy left the Ambassador Hotel's ballroom through a service area to greet kitchen workers. In a crowded kitchen passageway, Sirhan Sirhan, a 24-year-old Palestinian-born Jordanian, opened fire with a .22 caliber revolver and mortally wounded Kennedy.

THOSE were Bobby Kennedy’s last public words? “Let’s do Chicago next!”?

The 1968 election eventually went to Richard Nixon.

And today, 56 years after 1968, Donald Trump of ((New York)) has stated his intention to lead an army into Chicago to destroy any politician “supporting illegal immigration”, and he’s doing it with Bobby’s son RFK Jr. at his side.

Not a subtle message, that. My theory here is that the Masons split into a globalist-loyal faction and a Zionist-loyal faction. Current Illinois governor Pritzker being a Ukrainian Jew is reasonably convincing. The Zionist faction retreated to Los Angeles and the seminaries. And now, are they returning to claim their Chicago homeland? That would be so very Zionist of them. One wonders why Chicago might be so important to them, and yet, it appears to indeed be worth fighting over. It’s been somebody’s political stronghold pretty much since its founding.

Regarding that army he’s bringing, here’s a phone call. Context is Chicago’s 1968 Democrat National Convention.

Transcript

h ttps://prde.upress.virginia.edu/conversations/4005994

Edited by Kent B. Germany, with Kieran K. Matthews and Marc J. Selverstone

One of President Johnson’s most important supporters was Chicago mayor Richard J. “Dick” Daley, whose political machine held sway over 20 votes on Capitol Hill. The day before, Daley had the state of Illinois call out 6,000 National Guardsmen in Chicago “as a precautionary meaure” because of some “window breaking and some fires” in the aftermath of the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. assassination. The situation had worsened, and in this call, Daley asked for federal troops to restore order in his city. One problem in the deployment process was that Governor Otto Kerner Jr. was then out of state, so the request for troops would have to come from Lt. Governor Samuel H. Shapiro. The White House eventually sent in 5,000 U.S. Army troops.

In another conversation between Johnson and Daley later this month, Johnson would criticize the mayor for waiting too long to ask for troops.

White House Operator: There you are.

President Johnson: Hello?

Richard J. “Dick” Daley: Mr. President?

President Johnson: Yes, Dick.

Daley: We’re in trouble. We need some help.

President Johnson: Yes? I was afraid of that.

Daley: Yes. It’s starting to break down in different places.

President Johnson: Yeah.

Daley: And we just met with our people, and they felt that we should try to get some federal assistance. [President Johnson acknowledges.] I’ve talked to Governor [Samuel H.] Shapiro, and he’s ready to do anything and everything. So we need it—help—as soon as we can get it.

President Johnson: All right. First thing you ought to do is talk to the Attorney General [W. Ramsey Clark] and see what kind of a finding his legislature’s got to make. [In the] meantime, we’ll—I’ve talked to the Attorney General. I told him I’d called early this morning and told you, because they have to move from California, [Daley acknowledges] you see? They won’t do any good tonight.

Daley: Mm-hmm. Well, we [unclear]—

President Johnson: That’s why—

Daley: —hope to get them in tonight, if we can.

President Johnson: Well, we—

Daley: Where is Ramsey tonight?

President Johnson: He’s right here at the Department of Justice, and I’ll switch you over there now, and you can talk to him. But the governor has to for[mally]— [Daley acknowledges throughout.] you know, the finding they have to make? They have to make a finding in the state that you’ve used all your Guard, that you’ve used all your facilities, that you’re unable to take care of the situation, and therefore, you ask for federal troops. Then he has to make a finding for the president, and the president has to issue an order. That is to keep a president from doing it except for the . . . at the instance of local officials.

Daley: I see.

I see, too. The legal hurdle for Trump is that Illinois Gov. Pritzker is not about to call up his own Illinois National Guard against himself and his Chicago cronies to stop the immivasion, and it’s legally uncertain if Trump can activate the Illinois National Guard himself against their own governor. Frankly, it would be dangerous to try. Armies don’t like to kill where their families live, know what I mean? The morale and loyalty problems are obvious.

As we see here, however, there IS legal precedent for the President to call in the regular Army if the National Guard is… not up to the local challenge. I bet Trump is counting on the Illinois National Guard being ordered to stand down, which will somehow create a manufactured crisis to let Trump skip using the NG at all. What was that magic word? “Insurrection”?

(I’m not 100% certain on that; the laws regarding Posse Comitatus are intentionally opaque to outsiders such as normal American citizens and independent watchdogs.)

One wonders if Pritzker can counter this by activating the National Guard himself, so it stays under his authority, then he orders them only to disregard Trump. I bet some Wormtongue will advise him to, because then we’d be talking Civil War Two for real, with two American armies deployed domestically against each other.

President Johnson: Now, that’s what I anticipated this morning, [Daley acknowledges throughout] and I knew dark was coming, and I knew if we thought we’d better have them, they ought to be moving.

Daley: [Unclear], these fellows kept saying to you, you know, which they will. But now this—we had a meeting—

President Johnson: [speaking over Daley] That’s what they did to me all day yesterday, and I just cried. [Daley acknowledges throughout.] I chew—I ate my fingernails off, and I finally ordered them in on my own while the mayor [Walter E. Washington] couldn’t make up his mind. And we got them in, but they got big headlines here today. Here’s the—”Too Little, Too Late? Long Stretches of the Capital Laid to Waste; What It Cost: 690 Injured, 299 Fires.” So what we’ll do is we’ll—we will . . . have Governor Shapiro call Ramsey, and I’ll have Ramsey alert to the call. He’ll be waiting for it.

Daley: All right.

President Johnson: Just tell him to call the White House, and they’ll connect him. [Daley acknowledges.] That's num[ber]—yeah. Just tell him to ask for the White House in Washington. They’ll connect him. He’ll tell him exactly what kind of a wire to send. He’ll ask him to dictate it.

Daley: Yeah.

President Johnson: And then, in the meantime, I’ll see where he can find the troops and how many. Do you know how many they want?

Daley: At least 3,000.

President Johnson: Yeah, well, you better say 5[000].

Daley: Yeah. I think we need 5[000].

President Johnson: I would tell him—

Daley: Fine.

President Johnson —what you do. And we’ll be right back to you, Dick.

Daley: I’ll have Shapiro call Ramsey—

President Johnson: That’s right.

Daley: —through the White House.

President Johnson: That’s right.

Daley: Thanks.

President Johnson: All right.

Daley: Thanks, Mr. President

President Johnson: Bye.

See, this is why I harp on about secret societies. A city police chief has the U.S. President on speed dial for backdoor military authorizations? That shouldn’t happen. Ever.

Anyway, Team Trump has definite history with the Chicago faction… certainly Masonic, probable Zionist vs globalist, and while I may not have all the players in the correct team uniforms yet, that’s Bobby Kennedy, Junior sitting on Trump’s bench. The people pushed out of Chicago/Illinois politics in 1968 are standing behind Donald.

However important the historical angle, Governor Pritzker is a Ukrainian Jew and Trump represents the Zionist Jew faction. Israel is on borrowed time without its Uncle Sugar, so Trump will seek to get results out of Chicago very quickly, and both sides of the Jewish Civil War are entrenching to play for keeps. Next year, I see a lot of Chicago banks getting emptied of wealth while many grudges get settled outside on the streets.