Why HIM, though? Was he always being primed for this, or was it pure coincidence? I find it difficult to believe that they'd spend 30+ years priming him for this specific confluence of events.
They didn't prime him. They hired him because of his (defunct) family history with the Technocracy movement.
The Trilateral Commission (Rockefeller, Inc.) needed a frontman to distract observers from who was really building the Technate, and picked somebody that an observer would think was part of a 30+ year conspiracy that doesn't actually exist, that doesn't point at the real perps. So they imported Musk, filled his wallet to make him look like the bestest winner ever and put him "in charge" of all their Technate agenda items. So long as Musk does what he's told to do... be a fake-and-gay Tony Stark... he gets to, well, be a fake-and-gay Tony Stark.
That's consistent with my previous sense that Musk doesn't like the Zionists. Israel screwed South Africa back in the day; Musk signed on with the globalist-aligned Rockefellers; then the Rockefellers changed sides and ordered Musk to become a Zionist. Ouch.
The current Technocracy reboot is probably meant to manage the American Empire's decline into self-sufficiency. Hence the Trilaterals switching loyalties from Globalist to Zionist?
Anyway, the Musk family conspiracy is 100% smoke and mirrors. If the Trilateral Commission hadn't offered Musk that First Class Ticket, he'd still be running his father's real estate grifts in South Africa without a care about what Grandpa Haldeman failed to do in Canada.
As I mentioned a couple of posts ago, I was thinking Musk had sold his soul to the Zionists in exchange for revenge over his son getting Transed.
But reading this (which clarified greatly, thank you), the ugly, cynical, crazy voice at the back of my mind just clapped back with a counter-hypothesis:
Did ((They)) intentionally screw with his son explicitly to provide cover for him ostensibly joining the Trump faction???
If fatherhood meant anything to him, he wouldn't have 13 children by 4 baby mommas.
If he saw his children as human beings, he wouldn't give them names like... let's limit ourselves to the English alphabet... #11 is named Techno Mechanicus.
Musk complaining about his kid going trannie, happened at about the time he embraced Zionism. Zionists don't do the trannie agenda, it's one of the few moral distinctions between the two factions. I believe he made up a tear-jerker story in order to explain his pivoting from Globo to Zio, because he dared not admit the order he was given.
Musk used his own child for a political prop, when his Daddy Issues made him convenient. Has he taken any personal interest in his kids yet, or did he complain, pivot and move on?
If Musk is concerned that Stargate might become an Orwellian nightmare and he won't tolerate such cruelty, then his opposition is good.
If instead, Musk thinks his Twit-X is sufficient to impose that Orwellian nightmare and he'd rather not waste time, then his opposition is evil.
We must not assume our leaders are altruistic heroes. Especially when their personal lives would disgust a welfare queen. Especially when they publicly dress up as demons and keep company with sociopaths and narcissists. Especially when they've worshiped at the Wailing Wall in tiny little hats.
Put your trust in God, not men. Elon will not protect you. He doesn't protect his own kids.
Why HIM, though? Was he always being primed for this, or was it pure coincidence? I find it difficult to believe that they'd spend 30+ years priming him for this specific confluence of events.
They didn't prime him. They hired him because of his (defunct) family history with the Technocracy movement.
The Trilateral Commission (Rockefeller, Inc.) needed a frontman to distract observers from who was really building the Technate, and picked somebody that an observer would think was part of a 30+ year conspiracy that doesn't actually exist, that doesn't point at the real perps. So they imported Musk, filled his wallet to make him look like the bestest winner ever and put him "in charge" of all their Technate agenda items. So long as Musk does what he's told to do... be a fake-and-gay Tony Stark... he gets to, well, be a fake-and-gay Tony Stark.
That's consistent with my previous sense that Musk doesn't like the Zionists. Israel screwed South Africa back in the day; Musk signed on with the globalist-aligned Rockefellers; then the Rockefellers changed sides and ordered Musk to become a Zionist. Ouch.
The current Technocracy reboot is probably meant to manage the American Empire's decline into self-sufficiency. Hence the Trilaterals switching loyalties from Globalist to Zionist?
Anyway, the Musk family conspiracy is 100% smoke and mirrors. If the Trilateral Commission hadn't offered Musk that First Class Ticket, he'd still be running his father's real estate grifts in South Africa without a care about what Grandpa Haldeman failed to do in Canada.
As I mentioned a couple of posts ago, I was thinking Musk had sold his soul to the Zionists in exchange for revenge over his son getting Transed.
But reading this (which clarified greatly, thank you), the ugly, cynical, crazy voice at the back of my mind just clapped back with a counter-hypothesis:
Did ((They)) intentionally screw with his son explicitly to provide cover for him ostensibly joining the Trump faction???
Elon Musk doesn't care about his children.
If fatherhood meant anything to him, he wouldn't have 13 children by 4 baby mommas.
If he saw his children as human beings, he wouldn't give them names like... let's limit ourselves to the English alphabet... #11 is named Techno Mechanicus.
Musk complaining about his kid going trannie, happened at about the time he embraced Zionism. Zionists don't do the trannie agenda, it's one of the few moral distinctions between the two factions. I believe he made up a tear-jerker story in order to explain his pivoting from Globo to Zio, because he dared not admit the order he was given.
Musk used his own child for a political prop, when his Daddy Issues made him convenient. Has he taken any personal interest in his kids yet, or did he complain, pivot and move on?
Elon warns against the Stargste program though.
Okay... but why did he do that?
If Musk is concerned that Stargate might become an Orwellian nightmare and he won't tolerate such cruelty, then his opposition is good.
If instead, Musk thinks his Twit-X is sufficient to impose that Orwellian nightmare and he'd rather not waste time, then his opposition is evil.
We must not assume our leaders are altruistic heroes. Especially when their personal lives would disgust a welfare queen. Especially when they publicly dress up as demons and keep company with sociopaths and narcissists. Especially when they've worshiped at the Wailing Wall in tiny little hats.
Put your trust in God, not men. Elon will not protect you. He doesn't protect his own kids.